Colonial Policy, Chieftaincy and Land Politics in Ghana: The Case Study of Gyaman

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47963/ajacc.v7i0.39

Keywords:

Gyaman, Demarcation, Boundary, Chieftaincy, Privileges

Abstract

The partition of Africa in the late nineteenth century destabilized some societies in Africa. In West Africa, the imaginary territorial boundaries divided the Nzema between Ivory Coast and Ghana, the Dagaaba between Burkina Faso and Ghana, and the Ewe between Togo and Ghana. The partition exercise also caused protracted disputes and neglect of existing ethnic groupings. Using information from oral, archival and secondary sources, this article examines the impact of the partition of Africa on Gyaman, a traditional ethnic setting in modern Ghana in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. The paper blames current Gyaman problems on the Partition exercise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Kwame ADUM–KYEREMEH, University of Ghana

    Kwame ADUM–KYEREMEH, PhD, is a Lecturer in the Department of History at the University of Ghana, Legon – Ghana. Email: kadum-kyeremeh@ug.edu.gh

  • Joseph Kwadwo AGYEMAN, University of Ghana

    Joseph Kwadwo AGYEMAN holds an MPhil Degree in African Studies from the Institute of African Studies at the University of Ghana, Legon – Ghana. Email: kwadwoagyemang120@gmail.com

Published

2018-12-05

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.