Strangers and authorities in the gold coast: Immigration control in colonial Ghana, 1900—1957

Authors

  • Adjei Adjepong epartment of History, Faculty of Arts, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47963/ajacc.v6i.861

Keywords:

Alien, citizen, citizenship, control, deportation, immigrant, immigration, regulation, repatriation

Abstract

Until the imposition of colonial rule on Africa, movements of people from one place to another were not restricted by national or regional borders, visa systems, or national security fears. The modern idea of immigration is related to the development of nation-states and nationality laws, which often distinguish between citizens and immigrants. Citizenship of a nation-stale confers on nationals an inalienable right of residence, employment and free movement in that state, but the residence, employment and movement of immigrants are subject to conditions set by immigration regulations. Since it was the colonial authorities that introduced immigration regulations into Ghana, any attempt to gain a good understanding of the history of immigration control in the country must start from the colonial times. Therefore, using both primary and secondary documents, this study examines the measures which the colonial authorities devised to control the entry of immigrants into Ghana as well as their stay in and exit from the country, and assesses the relative effectiveness of their implementation. It argues that the colonial authorities had been generally liberal towards immigrants in Ghana. The study concludes that the manner in which immigration control had been handled in the colonial era was partly accountable for the frequent influx of many 'illegal' migrants into Ghana after independence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-01

How to Cite

Adjepong, A. (2013). Strangers and authorities in the gold coast: Immigration control in colonial Ghana, 1900—1957. Abibisem: Journal of African Culture and Civilization, 6, 133–172. https://doi.org/10.47963/ajacc.v6i.861